Alright, so here's some additional data from the two servers. This is the original server, so it has DNSSEC enabled there's a 64MB jump in the VIRT size of the process on the 20th 2015-06-19 7:50 3553 root 20 0 121m 11m 4952 S 0.0 2.3 0:07.05 pluto 2015-06-19 14:20 3553 root 20 0 123m 13m 4952 S 0.0 2.7 0:10.20 pluto 2015-06-19 20:25 3553 root 20 0 124m 14m 4952 S 0.0 3.0 0:13.19 pluto 2015-06-19 21:35 3553 root 20 0 125m 15m 4952 S 0.0 3.1 0:13.77 pluto 2015-06-20 13:35 3553 root 20 0 129m 18m 3856 S 0.0 3.7 0:21.12 pluto 2015-06-20 17:50 3553 root 20 0 194m 19m 3856 S 0.0 3.9 0:23.32 pluto 2015-06-21 10:35 3553 root 20 0 198m 23m 3464 S 0.0 4.7 0:32.06 pluto 2015-06-22 06:30 3553 root 20 0 202m 28m 3268 S 0.0 5.8 0:43.29 pluto 2015-06-22 18:20 3553 root 20 0 205m 32m 3268 S 0.0 6.5 0:50.19 pluto
This is the server running without the DNSSEC code: 2015-06-19 20:25 2617 root 20 0 109m 6272 4584 S 0.0 1.2 0:00.09 pluto 2015-06-19 21:35 2617 root 20 0 109m 6632 4604 S 0.0 1.3 0:00.74 pluto 2015-06-20 13:35 2617 root 20 0 113m 10m 4604 S 0.0 2.1 0:11.14 pluto 2015-06-20 17:50 2617 root 20 0 114m 11m 4604 S 0.0 2.4 0:15.01 pluto 2015-06-21 10:35 2617 root 20 0 119m 16m 4604 S 0.0 3.3 0:32.69 pluto 2015-06-22 06:30 2617 root 20 0 124m 20m 3384 S 0.0 4.1 0:59.82 pluto 2015-06-22 18:20 2617 root 20 0 128m 23m 3384 S 1.0 4.8 1:19.18 pluto Memory usage is still growing, but there's no comparable memory jump; it's all linear. --Will
_______________________________________________ Swan mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan
