On Tuesday, October 15, 2002, at 08:57 PM, C.E. Forman wrote: [Snip] > Definitely a good one, in the sense that you'd be sparing the winner > from > being harrassed with requests for image copies. But do offer to > e-mail an > HTML version of the final auction page after close (with the winning > bidder's info edited out of course) so people can at least check on the > other bidders and get assurance that you're not using shilling to > drive the > price up. (Then again, you have a good rep as one of the Dragons, > hopefully > this wouldn't be necessary. But it never hurts to be proactive and > assure > your public.)
Hmm. I'm not sure about that. Letting everyone know who bid, except for the winning bidder seems to me to be killing the idea of a private auction. Maybe if I gave the list to the winning bidder since they are the one who would be most vulnerable to shills. I'll need to ponder your idea for a bit from the perspective of a buyer. [Snip] > Talk to Eli Tomlinson. He seems to have done a good job of promoting > his > quarter-million games auction. (Even though it didn't sell, it sure > got a > lot of attention.) Thanks. -- Edward Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to the swcollect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect' Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/