We have a similar issue here in Canada as anything that comes in with a value of more than CAN $20 (or CAN $60 if it's declared as a gift) is taxed at 15%. I've actually had items shipped to me where the seller had declared a higher value than the eBay auction value, thinking it made no difference. So now I always indicate in my e-mails that it's important that the declared value not be higher than the final auction value. If the seller chooses to put a lower value on it, then great, but as long as it's no higher than the actual auction value, I can't really complain about it. If it's a traded item, then I will ask for a low value since no money has changed hands. Otherwise, I can kind of understand that it doesn't look good on you to ask the seller to be dishonest. Still, the guy does sound somewhat over the top.

Stefan Lindblom wrote:
Hey gang,
 
I won an auction the other day on Ebay, and last night I sent a mail to the seller of the item. In the mail I gave him my address and and also left him instructions on how to package the game, which means... no receipt, declare it as a gift etc... customs still have a way of overdoing it over here, and paying tax for items they consider new even though they are 15-20 years old is not my idea of fun and well spent money. Anyway, here is the first mail I got:
 

Hello Stefan,
First, thanks for bidding our auction. Second, we understand that you are trying to avoid the VAT and we symphathize with you. Should there really be much VAT, if any, on this. Also, since you are asking us to help you "dodge the law" so to speak, will you be willing to break the law for us? Say...go rob the neighborhood jewelry store for us. We realize you do not know us but hey, what the heck, one good turn deserves another.
We can face serious legal consequences (imprisonment, fines, etc) for violating our international laws. All of our incoming and outgoing email messages are routed and filtered through legal authorities now, due to terrorism activities, so the chances of being caught are very very high.
We are here for fun and a little profit and really do no wish to become entangled with legal problems, so we will do everything "above board" and legal. Besides, is it really worth smearing you character over paltry sums. If you are going to do it, make sure it involves millions. Would we not look stupid being dragged in handcuffs in public because we tried to evade customs , etc, for maybe nothing or pennies.
Still want to deal? We, now, will only accept cold hard cash from you for your purchase. Since you have indicated that you want to thwart the law, maybe you are willing to thwart payment to us also. Some people like to pay and after receiving their item, cancel the payment. Who wins?
Regards,
national-server
 
 
 
I was like... what? Never gotten anything like that before in 4 years of trading. Was not sure how to reply but after a while I started writing. Both professionally and pretty personal as well, and since he was so paranoid I just felt I had to annoy him.. just a little. So I included this in my mail:
 
"So you mean that all your e-mails are possibly being read by others? So if I in this mail add words like muslim, Bush, bomb, terror.. the chance of having it read will be greater?"
 
 
 
Part of his reply included:
 
"The authorities tap the internet backbone whenever they wish for "national security" purposes and do not necessarily use just "keywords". Your messaging (and now mine) most likely will be flagged for watching because you did use keywords which causes automatic backbone routing to federal and international authorities. Tensions run high here now and just "joking" around is not immune to utmost surveillance. You see, we are not a free people anymore in the sense that we were. National security and "Homeland Defense" are and have been the nation's #1 priority ever since 9/11.
Of course, we won't be paranoid because we have nothing to hide and wish to continue on with our day to day business transactions."
 

As if I didnt know they would be flagged, that was why I wrote it, pure annoyance factor ;) And nooooo, he is not the least paranoid.. sure..
 
 
 
Just thought I should share this with you. Has any of you guys had any trouble with people reacting hostile when you want them to ship it discrete in order to try to avoid unnecessary involvement by the customs? Guy has zero feedback btw, although he claims to have another user as well.
 
/Stefan

Reply via email to