Hey, thanks for the reply. Yes, that's exactly what I'm after.
I did a quick mod as you suggested, and this time I got a different
result: The SWF *was* importable as an asset into the library of
another project and it came up as a Graphic object and a bitmap, and
not as an animated movie clip. But this is a step closer than
before. I know all images are inside the SWF because a) it's 1.3 meg
in size, and b) it plays fine in SAFlashplayer and in Firefox
(although those two were true before I removed the library tags).
Does the following look okay to you? This is the output of my script
on a single image:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<movie version="6" width="720" height="480" framerate="24">
<background color="#ffffff" />
<frame>
<clip id="kulippu0" import="0000.jpg" />
<place id="kulippu0" name="myKulippu0" x="0" y="0"
depth="1" />
</frame>
</movie>
For a lark I tried removing the <background> tag to no effect. Also,
if you don't place clips on stage the file is effectively empty
according to Flash MX. In case you're curious, the python script I
wrote is at http://ministryofdoom.org/cloud/foxfire/scripts/img2swf.py.
Anything else you think I should try?
Thanks again,
- Charles
On Jan 15, 2006, at 4:20 PM, Mark Winterhalder wrote:
> hi Charles,
>
> so, if i understand you correctly, you have a series of images and
> turn them into a single SWF, one per frame?
>
> you don't actually need the library tag if you don't want to pace the
> images on stage with actionscript later on. just remove it from around
> the clip-import tags. i don't know why flash crashes, but that should
> eliminate one potential cause. setting the version to 6 shouldn't do
> any harm, either, but isn't well tested -- just try it.
>
> hth,
> mark
_______________________________________________
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
