> am
> i correct in my understanding that the basic profile is just another
> built-in xslt similar to simple.
as far as i understand it, no. "basic" (or "swfml-ll", for "low level"
as it is called now) is the mother of all swfml dialects, pretty much
a SWF file format representation in XML. this is what "simple"
("swfml-s") is being transformed to by the built-in "simple"
stylesheet, and what your custom-xslt must transform your
custom-dialect to:
[xml --xslt-->] [swfml-ll --swfmill--> swf]
the second chunk is what "swfmill xml2swf" does, there's no way around
that part of the chain, it's swfmill's core functionality (along with
"swf2xml", which gives you swfml-ll as output). the first part is
added for convenience because swfml-ll would be very inconvenient to
work with for mere mortals. so "simple" is a built-in xslt for the
common swfml-s XML dialect which you can replace by using your custom
xslt with "swfmill xslt <custom-xslt> <custom-xml> <output.swf>",
which outputs to swfml-ll for further processing.
hth,
mark
On 3/28/06, Robert Jonathan Molesa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well, i haven't got quite that far just yet. more or less going to do
> some testing with the basic profile using some xml, if that works like i
> expect it to then i'll get into some xslt coding. just trying to
> determine what's required with the basic profile to compile an swf. am
> i correct in my understanding that the basic profile is just another
> built-in xslt similar to simple.
>
> Mark Winterhalder wrote:
> > On 3/27/06, Jon Molesa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Daniel or Mark,
> >>
> >
> > hmm... i'm just a user, if you roll your own xslt you know much more
> > than i do already... :)
> >
> > mark
> >
> >
> >
> >> I've been looking over the basic profile located at
> >> http://iterative.org/swfmill/doc/reference.html. I'm beginning to work
> >> on some xslt for swfmill. The about this document mentions that it is
> >> organized into chapters including Actions. Is this a typo, an reference
> >> to an incomplete feature, or am I just missing something?
> >>
> >> Also in reference to symbols, in the brief example would button creation
> >> also need to be included within the <symbols> tag? I'm interested in
> >> see what all I can do exactly. My guess is that swfmill is a complete
> >> or near complete inplementation of the swf library, and that the
> >> documentation just doesn't show it.
> >>
> >> I'm going to document my progress with the xslt endevor as I mentioned a
> >> while back about documenting this project, but I'll need some help from
> >> you guys along the way. Thanks.
> >>
> >> Jon Molesa
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> swfmill mailing list
> >> swfmill@osflash.org
> >> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://snafoo.org/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > swfmill mailing list
> > swfmill@osflash.org
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jon Molesa
> Owner - Consoltec
> 828-994-2067
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.consoltec.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> swfmill mailing list
> swfmill@osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
>
--
http://snafoo.org/
_______________________________________________
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
