HI Mark, > nice to read through all of the above -- congrats :)
Thanks! > > Last status update of the day. I've finally got swfmill compiling > > under cygwin, and I've got a lovely courier font document on how to > > compile standalone binaries for Windows from cygwin - just a little > > light bed-time reading. > > Frankly, considering Dan can probably make it an official release this > weekend, I'd consider this a waste of time if cross-compiling for > Windows isn't of other interest for you, because... > > > I'm going to try and squeeze a release out tomorrow. Mark, do you > > think Dan would mind if I upped the version number and made a > > semi-official release? > > ...AFAIK Dan has a release script that takes care of everything from > version numbers (which is handled by svn, I think) over compiling it > for Windows and Mac to uploading it along with the sources and > updating the website. I can see the release script for Windows, but not one for the Mac. I wonder if that's squirreled away on your friend's mac box. Either way I agree it would be better for Dan to provide the release builds, since he may be able to get swfmill statically linked on a Mac. > So, I don't think he would mind if you provided a pre-release > Erixtekila and others can take for a spin, but to avoid confusion it > would probably the best if you made the version easily distinguishable > from those in the main branch handled by the script, e.g. by adding > another .1 or maybe better .1.sw to the end. Sure, that I can do. I need to test the changes again though because last night they weren't working, but I'm not sure if that's down to the changes I made late yesterday or if I was too tired to test properly. > It's not up to me, of course, but I guess knowing if we could possibly > expect more supported tags soonish would be good. IMHO if you plan on > adding more tags over this weekend 0.2.12 should be delayed until > you're done actively spending time on it. I guess the better v8 > support easily justifies the version bump, but there's no point > rushing it out if there would be a 0.2.13 the very next day. I agree. I'm going to try and give some of the other tags some love - FileAttributes and Meta are on my hit list first since they seem relatively trivial. > Also, Dan actually returned already, but was totally sleep depraved so > he more or less fell straight to bed. I have no idea what his plans > for tomorrow are (he looked like he'll sleep for a while), but it > could go very quickly now if we're lucky. I told him you were working > on swfmill, and he mumbled something about a diff and that he had > worked on it, too (wouldn't we all spend time writing code if we were > vacationing in Spain in spring...). I can provide a diff for my changes, just as soon as I've tested them again this morning. > In any case, I don't need that tag for what I'm working on at the > moment, but if you had a tar ball I'd be happy to test the Linux > version. Wicked - I'll give you a shout when I have something stable. Cheers, Steve -- Steve Webster http://dynamicflash.com _______________________________________________ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
