Having SWFObject and jQuery as preloaded libraries on your site (a permanent part of your head file) would probably be a good thing to recommend if you have that little control over the output.
That's just a thought, anyway. I still don't know what you mean by version 19, I didn't think Flash went that high. (i.e. version 10 or somesuch) VP On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Vincent Polite < [email protected]> wrote: > Can you load up something like jQuery and use the document.ready() > function? > > VP > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:53 PM, citznfish <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Jul 22, 1:45 pm, Vincent Polite <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > You may also want to check things in Safari again. I am using v. 3.2.1 >> and >> > I get the alternate content page. One thing about that "hack" - when i >> did >> > my own testing, if I put the javascript in the <HEAD> of the HTML doc or >> I >> > put it in an established DOMREADY type of function (like jQuery domready >> > function), then it worked fine and the hack wasn't necessary. >> > Vincent >> >> >> You must have seen the site after i changed the detect to look for >> version 19. :) >> >> But in any case I do not have access to add code to the <head> since >> we serve these Flash items in via a 3rd party software solution >> (Mercado). It's really strange the way things work around here. If I >> had a few days I'd tell you. ;-) >> >> In any case it does seem to work correctly in IE/Safari with the alt >> content as well. Just FF is being a pest.. >> >> Sometimes you just can't put it all in the <head>... >> >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SWFObject" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
