Thank you Alan, XHTML 1.0 Strict and XHTML 1.1 are recommended to be served over the Internet with the "application/xml+xhtml" MIME type. I understand; therefore, that you are suggesting that users of XHTML incorporating SWFObject 2.2 should serve their documents with the "text/html" MIME type.
My testing indicates that although SWFObject 2.2 does not officially support the "application/xml+application" MIME type, well formed XHTML documents incorporating the "application/xml+xhtml" MIME type and utilizing SWFObject 2.2 should not have any issues with current Browsers. Of course, Javascript must also be enabled in the head of the document with "content-script-type" set to "text/javascript." Good day. Ken On Nov 15, 4:45 pm, Aran Rhee <[email protected]> wrote: > XHTML is officially supported (as noted in our docs, all examples are XHTML > 1.0 strict doctype). > > We don't however officially support the XHTML + XML mime type for the > reasons stated on the documentation page. If your page is working, then > great, but if there are any issues then you are, as they say "on your own" > :) > > Cheers, > Aran > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Ken Berry Media > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > Although the webpage utilizing SWFObject2.2 is served over the > > Internet as HTML, this version does appear entirely compatible with > > XHTML and the above mentioned MIME type. So although SWFObject2.2 > > does not officially support XHTML, my experience has not produced any > > notable issues except success. > > > reference: http://www.kenberrymedia.illuminae.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SWFObject" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
