Hi, Thanks for the responses. I was just in the process of testing this! The initial markup I posted did have an issue in Safari 3 (win), so I grabbed a copy of the following params page from the test suite:
http://www.bobbyvandersluis.com/swfobject/testsuite_2_2/test_params.html I've modified the markup in it so it reads as follows: <!--[if IE]><object id="myId" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E- AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="300" height="120"><![endif]--> <!--[if !IE]>--><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="test6_flashvars.swf" width="300" height="120"><!--<![endif]--> <param name="movie" value="test6_flashvars.swf" /> <param name="menu" value="false" /> <param name="wmode" value="transparent" /> <param name="flashvars" value="name1=hello&name2=world&name3=foobar" /> <div> <h1>Alternative content</h1> <p><a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer";><img src="test_params_files/get_flash_player.gif" alt="Get Adobe Flash player" /></a></p> </div> </object> I've tested the modified "test_params.html" page in the following browsers and everything works 100%. The results are all win based, if anyone can test mac that would be good: IE - 6, 7, 8 FF - 2, 3.5, 3.6(alpha) Safari - 3, 4 Opera - 9+ Chrome - 3 The movie param, as Kyle has said, shouldn't be an issue. It's a parameter so it'll be ignored if it isn't supported I would have thought. The main problem with the current syntax is that it adds a lot of page weight which I don't think is necessary, especially if there are a lot of flash vars. The above syntax avoids this and seems to work fine. Cheers, SJ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SWFObject" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en.
