The revised markup has now been tested more thoroughly. It has been put through browser cam and tested on win, mac, linux, with the following browsers:
IE, Firefox, Safari, Chrome, Opera For comparison, the original "test_params.html" page and the modified page have been tested together. The modified page has a red background for a quick visual comparisons. The results (screenshots) from the testing can be found on the following link: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3417104/swfobject/browsers.zip As you'll see from the results there is no difference between the original and modified versions. Unless anyone can point out any reasons for not using the modified markup? I personally would use it. It has a lot less page weight, uses one object per flash video instead of two, and the syntax I feel is more succinct. Cheers, SJ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SWFObject" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en.
