Hi Aran, Thanks for pointing me to this. I'm planning on switching to this option. Now I just need to upgrade from SWFObject 1.5!
Thanks, Nick On Oct 11, 7:02 am, Aran Rhee <[email protected]> wrote: > Have a look at the swfobject static embedding option. It gives you standards > compliant mark up along with js powered goodness for things like express > install and version detection if needed. > > Cheers, > Aran > > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Nick Sarnelli <[email protected]>wrote: > > > I began using SWFObject about 3.5 years ago, with the sole intention > > of ensuring IE7 users did not have to "Click to Activate" before > > interacting with a Flash element. > > > I believe "Click to Flash" has since been eliminated by Microsoft with > > an update to IE7. I believe it was never an issue with IE5,6,8,9. > > > Do you believe it is now safe to use standard compliant XHTML 1.1 to > > embed Flash without users having to "Click to Activate"? > > > Example: > > <object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="example.swf" > > width="640" height="380"><param name="example" value="example.swf" / > > ><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /></object> > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "SWFObject" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<swfobject%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SWFObject" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en.
