On 10/30/2013 09:49 AM, Lists wrote: > On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:50:40 +0100 Pablo Rodríguez wrote: >> On 10/28/2013 10:49 PM, John Sullivan wrote: >>> [...] >>> Use .include from the main .sc to incorporate those declarations >>> into the final SWF. > > That is merely attempted obfuscation of the original time-line data. > It doesn't exactly resolve the licensing issue.
Do you think it’s obfuscation? I think it’s only separation. >>> Both the script and the main .sc remain unencumbered, the "end user" >>> will need to provide their own source data to complete compilation. >> >> Thank you very much for this, John (you make my day :-)). > > .. and the source data along with the result of the compilation using > it, could be considered someone's artistic endeavour. > >> I think this can solve the issue (at least from the perspective of the >> user). > > Does it? Maybe (or perhaps) not. I have to analyze this. But even if it doesn’t solve the problem, I think it would be easier to write a GPL exception to this. Cheers, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk --------------- SWFTools-common is a self-managed list. To subscribe/unsubscribe, or amend an existing subscription, please kindly point your favourite web browser at:<http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/swftools-common>
