On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:56:20 +0100 Pablo Rodríguez <[email protected]> wrote:
> > That is merely attempted obfuscation of the original time-line data. > > It doesn't exactly resolve the licensing issue. > > Do you think it’s obfuscation? I think it’s only separation. I think I was using it in the context of putting the data in a format not all would understand, and tucking it out of sight. > > .. and the source data along with the result of the compilation > > using it, could be considered someone's artistic endeavour. > > > >> I think this can solve the issue (at least from the perspective of > >> the user). > > > > Does it? > > Maybe (or perhaps) not. I have to analyze this. Which will win out, the chicken or the egg? ;o) > But even if it doesn’t solve the problem, I think it would be easier > to write a GPL exception to this. To be fair.. I have got a tad lost myself now! A basic question on embedding a textile into an swf and reading it from Actionscript, has turned into a full blow epic on Copyright! Maybe a little separation is what's required after all.. FTT if you please.. Chris. --------------- SWFTools-common is a self-managed list. To subscribe/unsubscribe, or amend an existing subscription, please kindly point your favourite web browser at:<http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/swftools-common>
