And '-G' didn't help. Best regards, Mladen.
2014-03-31 11:17 GMT+02:00 Mladen Mijatovic <kapadok...@gmail.com>: > Thanks for the answer, Peter. I am testing it now with -G option. Maybe > this will solve my problem, cause I can not depend on optimising in > Acrobat, there will be files on my server added from many users, so can't > control that. Maybe to reduce file size for pdf that can be uploaded, cause > this is way to much for now, 500Mb, but it is customer requirement. > > Best regards, > Mladen. > > > 2014-03-31 11:05 GMT+02:00 Piotr <pikot...@gmail.com>: > > We've found that it's very useful to optimize pdf by using Acrobat before >> pdf2swf processing. In many cases it solved the problem you mentioned. >> >> Regards, Peter >> >> >> 2014-03-30 3:11 GMT+02:00 Mladen Mijatovic <kapadok...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am using SWFTools, especially pdf2swf. But I have problems with a size >>> of pdf docs, I am trying to convert some pdf's that are from 120Mb - 460Mb. >>> Is this possible? I am getting error '*This is too complex to render >>> SWF, only supports 65536 shapes at once*' . Can this be fixed with some >>> of parameters in pdf@swf command? I execute with poly2bitmap but this >>> doesn't solve my problem. >>> >>> I will try -s bitmap and --flatening. Is there some other option to help >>> me and is some of those can produce bad swf quality? >>> >>> Also I need some basic instructions on how to add some custom text >>> watermark in swf file? >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> --------------- >>> SWFTools-common is a self-managed list. To subscribe/unsubscribe, or >>> amend an existing subscription, please kindly point your favourite web >>> browser at:<http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/swftools-common> >>> >> >> >
--------------- SWFTools-common is a self-managed list. To subscribe/unsubscribe, or amend an existing subscription, please kindly point your favourite web browser at:<http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/swftools-common>
