These things are achievable, in my opinion. At a minimum, it's worth pinging Nate to have him join in on the discussion rather than trying to replace a really great site that already does a large part of what people are looking for.
-- Erica > On Jan 6, 2016, at 6:19 PM, Trent Nadeau via swift-dev <[email protected]> > wrote: > > SwiftDoc is nice, but it doesn't quite do everything I want. The pages for > protocols don't list implementing types in the stdlib, and the pages for > types don't separate the methods by the protocol(s) that require them. Both > are very useful when using generics so that the developer can create the best > bounds (i.e., the ones that are least restrictive but still have the required > operations and semantics). > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 5:44 PM, James Campbell <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > swiftdoc.org <http://swiftdoc.org/> > > > > -- > Trent Nadeau > _______________________________________________ > swift-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
_______________________________________________ swift-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
