I completely agree. SwiftDoc is great, and I really appreciate Nate's work in creating it. It's already very useful and is (IMHO) the prettiest programming language docs site I've seen.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Erica Sadun <[email protected]> wrote: > These things are achievable, in my opinion. At a minimum, it's worth > pinging Nate to have him join in on the discussion rather than trying to > replace a really great site that already does a large part of what people > are looking for. > > -- Erica > > > On Jan 6, 2016, at 6:19 PM, Trent Nadeau via swift-dev < > [email protected]> wrote: > > SwiftDoc is nice, but it doesn't quite do everything I want. The pages for > protocols don't list implementing types in the stdlib, and the pages for > types don't separate the methods by the protocol(s) that require them. Both > are very useful when using generics so that the developer can create the > best bounds (i.e., the ones that are least restrictive but still have the > required operations and semantics). > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 5:44 PM, James Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> swiftdoc.org > > > > > > -- > Trent Nadeau > _______________________________________________ > swift-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev > > > -- Trent Nadeau
_______________________________________________ swift-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
