“parameter” is a good thought. On it’s own it seems like it’s missing something though. But it gives me other ideas: “typeparam”, “type param", “typeparameter”, or “type parameter”.
Matt > On Dec 22, 2015, at 07:40, Guillaume Lessard via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 21 déc. 2015, at 17:57, Jordan Rose via swift-evolution >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> When you're actually implementing a generic function, the generic parameter >> is [snip] > > Here's a word with meaning: parameter. Everything else I've seen sounds vague > or approximate. Using the idea of a parameter would solidify the conceptual > relationship between protocols-with-associated-types and generics. > > protocol P { > parameter T > } > > Guillaume Lessard > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
