> On Dec 22, 2015, at 11:05 AM, Matt Whiteside via swift-evolution
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> “parameter” is a good thought. On it’s own it seems like it’s missing
> something though. But it gives me other ideas: “typeparam”, “type param",
> “typeparameter”, or “type parameter”.
It’s not a parameter, though, because it does not vary the way a parameter
does: a given type X cannot conform to a protocol with two different bindings
for a given associated type.
- Doug
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
