I would prefer the type definition for functions return type to be the same
syntax as the type definition for parameters - which would leave the arrows for
things like lambdas.
i.e.
func test(symbol: String): Bool {
}
> On 2015-12-23, at 9:30:24, Andrey Tarantsov via swift-evolution
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> So I believe the opinion of the core team and the community would be
> generally in opposition to the style you want. I understand your arguments,
> but somehow they are against the entire experience of me (and, presumably,
> others) as developers.
>
> To continue our friendly banter, though, do you mind sharing your background?
> When I read this, I wasn't sure if you're serious or trolling:
>
>> I would propose changing it from:
>>
>> { (param_list) -> return_type in … }
>>
>> to something cleaner like:
>>
>> (param_list) -> return_type => { … }
>
> I wonder if doing something like Haskel a lot makes you more used to that
> sort of arrow constructs?
>
> This is written in good faith; I hope I used the right tone to indicate that.
>
> A.
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
