> I'm completely against replacing '->' by ':' it would make unreadable the
> declaration of a function taking a closure as parameter, or returning one
> (among other things).
That's definitely right: Two different separators only shift the problem by one
level, but hopefully it won't become common to deal with "functions having
functions as parameters that have function parameters that… ;-)
Also there is the different meaning of ":" ("is a...") and "->" ("returns a…")_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
