The thing is associated type means nothing to me, it's too technical. Placeholder type I think would be better even if it's only what we called it in the documentation
Sent from my iPhone > On 23 Dec 2015, at 20:35, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Dec 23, 2015, at 9:59 AM, Erica Sadun <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> And what are your feelings about: typestandin, typeplaceholder, or >> adoptedtype? How would you describe the functionality of these members if >> you weren't looking for a keyword? > > These don’t really speak to me, just because they aren’t the terminology that > people use to refer to these. “standin” and “placeholder” are also pretty > vacuous. > > -Chris > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
