Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 23, 2015, at 2:42 PM, James Campbell via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > The thing is associated type means nothing to me, it's too technical. > Placeholder type I think would be better even if it's only what we called it > in the documentation Programming languages are technical and it has a very clear meaning in Swift. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 23 Dec 2015, at 20:35, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 23, 2015, at 9:59 AM, Erica Sadun <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> And what are your feelings about: typestandin, typeplaceholder, or >>> adoptedtype? How would you describe the functionality of these members if >>> you weren't looking for a keyword? >> >> These don’t really speak to me, just because they aren’t the terminology >> that people use to refer to these. “standin” and “placeholder” are also >> pretty vacuous. >> >> -Chris >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
