Why has there been such a big discussion? I suspect because this is an obvious 
win. There's less discussion of "should there be this change" and more of "how 
should this be changed". The relative lightweight nature of the latter inspires 
lots of input. When a topic gets more technical in nature, those who are 
heavily invested, with expertise in building compilers and with specialized 
knowledge of other languages, focus the discussion.

Turns out in the end that there was an underlying "term of art" (or however 
that is put) along with the descriptions in the book, so there never was going 
to probably be anything deeper than "associatedType", "associatedtype" or 
"associated", in my opinion.

Why secrecy? There is none. I was asked to run a poll. I ran a poll using the 
best information I had at the moment. I don't have money to spend on 
SurveyMonkey so it cut off at 100 replies. You can't see the extra replies. I 
can't see the extra replies. Even playing field.

-- Erica, who had no ulterior motives


> On Jan 3, 2016, at 2:31 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jan 3, 2016, at 10:55 AM, Tino Heth via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I'm not opposing the proposal, but I wonder why there has been such a big 
>> discussion (and a poll whose results have neither been revealed completely 
>> nor affected the choice of the keyword)…
>> 
>> Swift has proven it can thrive in secrecy, so I don't think the whole open 
>> community is a necessity — but as it is now, we should hold transparency in 
>> high esteem and not start faking democracy.
> 
> I’m confused, what are you saying?  No decision has been made here, I’m not 
> aware of any “secrecy” issue.
> 
> -Chris 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to