> On a re-read I am -1; I like the `associatedtype` keyword but didn’t realize > there was no plan to let `typealias` be used within a protocol to as a > convenience (and to preserve intent, and to improve the development > experience when still figuring out an interface design). > > I would prefer the new keyword and also adding/allowing one to add > convenience typealiases within a protocol definition.
I would love to see convenience typealiases supported in protocols eventually, but I actually think that should wait until after the transition to `associatedtype` is well behind us so we can get people used to the new keyword. -- Brent Royal-Gordon Architechies _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
