> On Mar 17, 2016, at 11:22 AM, Harlan Haskins <har...@harlanhaskins.com> wrote:
>
> Since we’re allowing keywords as argument names, shouldn’t this:
>
> func foo(let i: Int)
Right now, you’d have to declare this as
func foo(`let` i: Int)
but the proposal would fix that.
> be allowed, such that it’ll be called as this:
>
> foo(let: 3)
Right.
- Doug
>
> — Harlan
>
>> On Mar 17, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 17, 2016, at 1:27 AM, Nicholas Maccharoli via swift-evolution
>>> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> As a follow-up to proposal SE-0003: "Removing var from Function
>>> Parameters" being accepted,
>>> I think it might make sense to disallow explicitly declaring function
>>> parameters with the `let` keyword since function parameters are immutable
>>> by default.
>>>
>>> Basically disallow writing functions like this:
>>>
>>> func foo(let i: Int) { ... }
>>>
>>> and only allow the function above to be expressed as this:
>>>
>>> func foo(i: Int) { … }
>>
>> This makes perfect sense to me. Want to write up a proposal?
>>
>> - Doug
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
