Looks great, thanks!
- Doug
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 9:45 PM, Nicholas Maccharoli <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Thank you!
>
> I have filed a PR here: https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/pull/215
> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/pull/215>
>
> How does it look?
>
> - Nick
>
>
> All the best,
>
> Nicholas
>
> Linked in:
> http://lnkd.in/328U22 <http://lnkd.in/328U22>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Yes, please file a PR.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Chris Lattner <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>> Sure, I’m ok with that if that is what Doug prefers.
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>>> On Mar 17, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Nicholas Maccharoli <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you for the feedback!
>>>
>>> I checked SE-0003 again and didnt see explicit mention of this.
>>>
>>> I would like to write up a quick proposal today if its ok.
>>>
>>> Chris, I promise to make it very concise is it ok to send over a PR to
>>> swift evolution?
>>>
>>> - Nick
>>>
>>> 2016年3月18日金曜日、Chris Lattner<[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>さんは書きました:
>>>
>>>> On Mar 17, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution
>>>> <[email protected] <>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 17, 2016, at 1:27 AM, Nicholas Maccharoli via swift-evolution
>>>>> <[email protected] <>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> As a follow-up to proposal SE-0003: "Removing var from Function
>>>>> Parameters" being accepted,
>>>>> I think it might make sense to disallow explicitly declaring function
>>>>> parameters with the `let` keyword since function parameters are immutable
>>>>> by default.
>>>>>
>>>>> Basically disallow writing functions like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> func foo(let i: Int) { ... }
>>>>>
>>>>> and only allow the function above to be expressed as this:
>>>>>
>>>>> func foo(i: Int) { … }
>>>>
>>>> This makes perfect sense to me. Want to write up a proposal?
>>>
>>> The intention was for this to be included as part of SE-0003. If it
>>> wasn’t, then that was an accidental omission. Do we really need a full
>>> proposal for that?
>>>
>>> -Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>>
>>> Nicholas
>>>
>>> Linked in:
>>> http://lnkd.in/328U22 <http://lnkd.in/328U22>
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
