> On Apr 5, 2016, at 4:17 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > on Tue Apr 05 2016, Erica Sadun <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Apr 5, 2016, at 1:54 PM, Dave Abrahams >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> IMO this: >> >> (-9...0).reverse() >> >> is better than >> >> stride(from: 0, to: -10, by: -1) >> >> What do you think? >> >> The latter better reflects an author's actual intent. The former depends on >> implementation details, which can be hazy, especially, around the edge >> cases. It >> is quicker to read, understand, and verify that the latter is what is >> meant. > > Except that there seems to be some confusion over what "to:" means, right?
obviously (0..<-10).by(-2) would be best. -- E _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
