Well, probably best to have another operator: 0..>(-10). We go from 0 to greater than -10. On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:22 PM Erica Sadun via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Apr 5, 2016, at 4:17 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > on Tue Apr 05 2016, Erica Sadun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Apr 5, 2016, at 1:54 PM, Dave Abrahams > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> IMO this: > >> > >> (-9...0).reverse() > >> > >> is better than > >> > >> stride(from: 0, to: -10, by: -1) > >> > >> What do you think? > >> > >> The latter better reflects an author's actual intent. The former > depends on > >> implementation details, which can be hazy, especially, around the edge > cases. It > >> is quicker to read, understand, and verify that the latter is what is > >> meant. > > > > Except that there seems to be some confusion over what "to:" means, > right? > > > obviously (0..<-10).by(-2) would be best. > > -- E > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
