I think I would be -1 on this.

The proposal is that there be two names, Self and self that refer to different 
objects but are differentiated only by the capitalisation of the first letter 
and these could be mixed in the same context. 

I think this would make code that uses both harder to read. If typing 
‘self.dynamicType’ is too onerous, how about shortening it in a different way? 
Why, for instance is ‘self.' mandatory? Alternatively, why is it ‘dynamicType’ 
and not just ‘type’?

> On 6 Apr 2016, at 10:51, Adrian Kashivskyy via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1 for Self and the proposal.
> 
> 
> Pozdrawiam – Regards,
> Adrian Kashivskyy
> 
>> Wiadomość napisana przez Bernd Ohr (jazzbox) via swift-evolution 
>> <[email protected]> w dniu 06.04.2016, o godz. 09:11:
>> 
>> I am using a typealias for this:
>> 
>> struct MyStruct {
>>    private typealias _Self = MyStruct
>> 
>>    static func staticMethod() { print("staticMethod") }
>> 
>>    func instanceMethod() {
>>        _Self.staticMethod()
>>    }
>> }
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>> On Apr 5, 2016, at 4:17 PM, Timothy 
>>>> Wood<[email protected](mailto:[email protected])>wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 5, 2016, at 3:04 PM, Joe Groff via 
>>>>> swift-evolution<[email protected](mailto:[email protected])>wrote:
>>>>> What you're describing should be spelled `Self`, IMO. I think Tim 
>>>>> intended `#Self` to mean the *static* type the code is declared inside 
>>>>> (which is the same as Self unless you're in a class).
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, that is what I was aiming for. `#Self` would be a pretty much textual 
>>>> replacement just like #file, etc. That is, I could imaging it being used 
>>>> in a bunch of cases (not useful here, but just intending to enumerate the 
>>>> possible uses I see):
>>> Please check to ensure that the changes I just made match your expectations:
>>> 
>>> https://gist.github.com/erica/c60c7d51809889f3dfd47cdb482d6227
>>> 
>>> -- E
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to