on Wed Apr 06 2016, Erica Sadun <erica-AT-ericasadun.com> wrote: > On Apr 6, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Dave Abrahams <[email protected]> wrote: > > These all look reasonable to me. > > Lastly, if you want the positive stride reversed, you'd do just that: > > (0 ... 9).striding(by: 2).reverse() == [8, 6, 4, 2, 0] > > Also reasonable. > > -- > Dave > > Unless there's a compelling reason to fight here, it looks like the > opinion against where I'm standing is pretty overwhelming at least in > this subgroup. To simplify things going forward (and to avoid compiler > warnings, which as Dave A points out is probably an indication of bad > design more than bad users), I'm willing to adopt in as well.
Thanks. In that case, I suggest that we entertain two separate proposals: 1. add the .striding(by: n) method. 2. add the other range operators. Though they both have obvious benefits, I expect #1 is a much easier sell than #2, which is one good reason to separate them. -- Dave _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
