Chris, Thanks. The distraction factor makes sense. I will update SR-1134 as discussed and mark it as post Swift v3.
On 9 April 2016 at 14:13, Chris Lattner <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 8, 2016, at 8:02 AM, hitstergtd+swiftevo--- via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Chris, > > Thanks for supporting it in principle. I understand that it is out of > scope for Swift 3 and that using C is one of the only decent > workarounds at the moment. > > However, since you concur with what is being requested, would it be OK to: > > (a) Draft a summary proposal and commit it to the swift-evolution@ > repository, perhaps under "Other Proposals" or "Post v3"? and/or > (b) Add some notes under docs/, perhaps in docs/LibraryEvolution.rst > regarding this topic? > > > We don’t have a hard rule against discussing things beyond swift 3, but we > generally discourage it. There is too much important stuff going on in the > swift 3 timeframe as it is, and the distraction factor can be very high. > I’d suggest filing a bug in bugs.swift.org, and you can work on a sketch of > a proposal there. Thanks! > > -Chris _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
