Thanks! -Chris
> On Apr 9, 2016, at 9:47 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Chris, > > Thanks. The distraction factor makes sense. I will update SR-1134 as > discussed and mark it as post Swift v3. > >> On 9 April 2016 at 14:13, Chris Lattner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Apr 8, 2016, at 8:02 AM, hitstergtd+swiftevo--- via swift-evolution >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Chris, >> >> Thanks for supporting it in principle. I understand that it is out of >> scope for Swift 3 and that using C is one of the only decent >> workarounds at the moment. >> >> However, since you concur with what is being requested, would it be OK to: >> >> (a) Draft a summary proposal and commit it to the swift-evolution@ >> repository, perhaps under "Other Proposals" or "Post v3"? and/or >> (b) Add some notes under docs/, perhaps in docs/LibraryEvolution.rst >> regarding this topic? >> >> >> We don’t have a hard rule against discussing things beyond swift 3, but we >> generally discourage it. There is too much important stuff going on in the >> swift 3 timeframe as it is, and the distraction factor can be very high. >> I’d suggest filing a bug in bugs.swift.org, and you can work on a sketch of >> a proposal there. Thanks! >> >> -Chris _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
