> On Apr 14, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Proposal link: 
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0062-objc-keypaths.md
>  
> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0062-objc-keypaths.md>
> 
> Hello Swift Community,
> 
> The review of SE-0062 "Referencing Objective-C key-paths” ran from April 
> 7...12, 2016. The proposal is accepted, with one adjustment to the handling 
> of collections: rather than support any SequenceType as a collection, the 
> core team wants a narrower rule for only the primary Cocoa collection types 
> (NSArray, NSDictionary, NSSet) and their Swift-bridged equivalents (Array, 
> Dictionary, Set), due to implementation concerns.
> 
> Feedback on this proposal was generally positive, and the proposal fits well 
> with #selector (SE-0022 
> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0022-objc-selectors.md>).
>  There was some discussion during the review of extending the proposal to 
> more strongly-typed key paths. However, the core team felt that this feature 
> is important for Swift 3 to support the renaming of Objective-C APIs in Swift 
> (SE-0005 
> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0005-objective-c-name-translation.md>),
>  and that such a significant increase in scope would jeopardize the feature 
> for Swift 3.
> 
> We welcome an implementation of this proposal. I’ve filed a ticket at
> 
>       We welcome an implementation of this proposal. I’ve filed a ticket at

Paste fail, it’s here:

        https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1237

> 
> to track the implementation.
> 
>       - Doug
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution-announce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution-announce

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to