Less than or equal to is not the same as not greater than, because two unordered values are not less than or equal to and also not greater than. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 15:51 plx via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote:
> FWIW, you can avoid the multiple-preposition issue it differently: > > - isLessThanOrEqual(to:) => isNotGreaterThan(_:), isAtOrBelow(_:), etc. > > …neither of which I can claim to really like, but such possibilities exist. > > Offering in case there's a better phrasing along similar lines. > > On Apr 20, 2016, at 3:08 PM, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution < > [email protected]> wrote: > > I'm saying something else. The preposition that goes with "less" is > "than," while "to" goes only with "equal." By making "to" a parameter label > you've got {less than or equal} to, which is inelegant because the label > cannot be distributed to both parts--i.e. one cannot say "less than to or > equal to." > > Put another way, I could just as well rewrite the method as > `equalToOrLess(than:)`. Now, the parameter is labeled "than" instead of > "to," yet the parameter serves the same purpose. Thus, I argue that the > proposed method name may meet the letter of the Swift guidelines but is > awkward. > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 14:44 Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> on Tue Apr 19 2016, Xiaodi Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > * What is your evaluation of the proposal? >> > >> > +1 in intent. Specifics require further refinement. For example: >> > >> > Internal inconsistencies in capitalization: >> > * `signalingNaN` but `isSignalingNan` and `isNan` >> > >> > Parameter labels, or whatever they're called now, do not reflect newly >> > adopted Swift syntax in SE-0046: >> > * `static func maximum(x: Self, _ y: Self) -> Self` should be `static >> > func maximum(_ x: Self, _ y: Self) -> Self`, etc. >> > >> > Infelicitous use of prepositions to conform superficially to new >> > naming guidelines: >> > * `isEqual(to:)` is fine, but for consistency there's >> > `isLessThanOrEqual(to:)`, which is not fine, because the preposition >> > "to" applies only to "equal" and not to "less than" >> >> That seems like a huge stretch to me. Are you claiming it's wrong to >> say “x is less than or equal to y,” or are you saying something else? >> >> -- >> Dave >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >> > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
