Eh, “going away” might be too strong… They’re changing a lot. There’s still the extra overhead though. > On Apr 28, 2016, at 7:49 PM, David Sweeris via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > >> On Apr 28, 2016, at 11:50 AM, Vladimir.S via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >> >> I think I like this idea. It is clear that it is init() and 'defer' says >> that it is called at the end of each init. IMO we need exactly some kind of >> 'init' as only in init we can set un-initialized stored properties. >> >> But, why implicitly unwrapped optionals are not solution here? I.e. > > To avoid the extra overhead. Also, they’re sorta going away in Swift 3: > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0054-abolish-iuo.md > > - Dave Sweeris > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
