On 4/29/16 21:32, Jordan Rose via swift-evolution wrote:
> [Proposal: 
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0072-eliminate-implicit-bridging-conversions.md]
> 
> I’m a little concerned about the affect this has on “plist literals”. 
> Specifically, I can no longer construct a dictionary like this:
> 
> let userInfo: [String: AnyObject] = [
>       kSomeStandardKey: self.name, // a String
>       kAnotherKey: self.childNames // an Array of Strings
> ]
> NSNotificationCenter.default().postNotificationName(MyNotification, self, 
> userInfo)
> 
> The fix isn’t that hard—just add “as NSString” or “as NSArray”—but it is a 
> bit of extra noise that we currently don’t have. If the type checker can 
> still offer that fix-it, then I’m not sure we’d actually get any compiler 
> simplification out of it…although I suppose it might make the happy path 
> faster.

Somewhat naïve question (not currently able to test this) but shouldn't
        `let userInfo: [String: NSObject] = [`...
force NSthingies for all the subsequent lines?

If not, might that be done?

> The CFString issue Jacob brought up is also a little unfortunate, although 
> that’s about the direction that already requires an explicit coercion. But 
> this probably affects calling CF functions that take CFStrings, since IIRC we 
> don’t treat that the same as NSString at the moment, and CFArray will never 
> have generics.
> 
> Of course, I’ve been out of the Cocoa community for a while now, so I don’t 
> really have a sense of how often this comes up in practice, and how much the 
> explicit coercion costs (psychologically). So I’m with Brent: do we have 
> information on the changes needed for real-world projects?
> 
> Jordan
> 
> 
>> On Apr 26, 2016, at 13:54, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Swift community,
>>
>> The review of "SE-0072: Fully eliminate implicit bridging conversions from 
>> Swift" begins now and runs through May 2. The proposal is available here:
>>
>>      
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0072-eliminate-implicit-bridging-conversions.md
>>
>> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews 
>> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at:
>>
>>      https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>
>> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review 
>> manager.
>>
>>
>> What goes into a review?
>>
>> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review 
>> through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of 
>> Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to 
>> answer in your review:
>>
>>      * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>>      * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change 
>> to Swift?
>>      * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
>>      * If you have you used other languages or libraries with a similar 
>> feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
>>      * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick 
>> reading, or an in-depth study?
>>
>> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
>>
>>      https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> -Chris Lattner
>> Review Manager
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 


-- 
Rainer Brockerhoff  <[email protected]>
Belo Horizonte, Brazil
"In the affairs of others even fools are wise
In their own business even sages err."
http://brockerhoff.net/blog/

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to