> > * What is your evaluation of the proposal? > +1, because: - I believe the default/generic "printing" initializer is not commonly used (at least, not on purpose). - The new argument label clearly indicates what the initializer does.
I would also submit for consideration "*init(describing:)*", to match the CustomStringConvertible ".description" property which it invokes. > * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a > change to Swift? > Yes: accidental use of the initializer can be harmful, and is currently very easy. > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? > Yes, it fits well with the API guidelines. > * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar > feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? > N/A > * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? > A quick reading.
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
