Another +1 to Jacob's suggestion, and of course +1 to the intent of the proposal itself.
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Austin Zheng via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote: > I like Jacob's suggestion of "init(describing:)", and I also think the > review team should consider the global function alternative. My main goal > is also preventing silently incorrect code. > > Austin > > > On May 17, 2016, at 10:14 PM, Karl Wagner via swift-evolution < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > I would still prefer a global function; because the output is from > reflection, it’s really more for debugging purposes than actually > serialising something. > > > > But any change to this gets a +1 from me. It’s too easy to accidentally > call this instead of one of the other argument-less initialisers on String. > > > > Karl > > > >> On 18 May 2016, at 05:32, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hello Swift community, > >> > >> The review of "SE-0089: Renaming String.init<T>(_: T)" begins now and > runs through May 23. The proposal is available here: > >> > >> > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0089-rename-string-reflection-init.md > >> > >> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All > reviews should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at > >> > >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > >> > >> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the > review manager. > >> > >> What goes into a review? > >> > >> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review > through constructive criticism and contribute to the direction of Swift. > When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer > in your review: > >> > >> * What is your evaluation of the proposal? > >> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a > change to Swift? > >> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? > >> * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar > feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? > >> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? > >> > >> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at > >> > >> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md > >> > >> Thank you, > >> > >> -Chris Lattner > >> Review Manager > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> swift-evolution mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > > > _______________________________________________ > > swift-evolution mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
