Does anyone want to speak up in favor of 'Any<>'? The more I think about it the more I think 'Any' should just be the single, canonical form.
Austin > On May 18, 2016, at 11:33 PM, Colin Barrett <[email protected]> > wrote: > > There's no need for this, that's what I was trying to get across. It's > (likely) a special case in the grammar right now. If we eliminate Any<>, from > the point of view of syntax, both Any and Any<Foo, Bar> are just a built in > type and normal application of generic arguments (to a built in type). > > -Colin (via thumbs) > >> On May 19, 2016, at 1:58 AM, Austin Zheng <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> - 'Any<>' should be allowed. You can currently use 'protocol<>' in your code >> instead of 'Any'. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
