> 
>    * What is your evaluation of the proposal?

+1.  As I said in a previous review, I like that we have decided on keyword 
naming conventions and are bringing existing keywords in line.

>    * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to 
> Swift?

Yes.

>    * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?

Yes.

>    * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, 
> how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?

N/A

>    * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, 
> or an in-depth study?

Quick glance and participation in the original discussion.
> 
> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
> 
>    https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> -Chris Lattner
> Review Manager
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution-announce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution-announce

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to