> * What is your evaluation of the proposal? +1
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change > to Swift? Probably, although I don’t think it’s an essential change. I do believe strongly that “dynamicType” is better than “typeof", for the reason explained in the proposal: It is unclear whether it’s the static or dynamic type. > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? Yes > * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, > how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? ObjC, but I don’t think it compares well > * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick > reading, or an in-depth study? Read the proposal and some of the previous discussion. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
