> On 27 May 2016, at 04:44, Austin Zheng via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> My personal preference would be to honor access control, and consider ser/de 
> separately (especially since there are so many other possible considerations 
> for that feature). Access control in Swift isn't just another safety feature, 
> it's also a boundary for things like the optimizer.
> 
> To be honest, I expect the first big use of a feature like this to be turning 
> JSON or XML received from a network call into model objects for an app. There 
> are quite a few Objective-C libraries that use KVC to implement this 
> functionality.

That's what I want to use it for and I'm fairly sure we need access to private 
properties for that.
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to