> Am 31.05.2016 um 10:14 schrieb Chris Williams via swift-evolution
> <swift-evolution@swift.org>:
>
> Honestly what I’ve wanted for quite some time is just reasonable default
> parameter names. $0/$1… or any variation on index-based arguments is terrible
> for comprehension, and I feel like I’m being lazy and hurting whoever has to
> look at the code next every time I type out something like say <A [String:
> String]?.map { $0 } instead of .map{ key, value in key }.
So, just write the latter.
> If the Dictionary type’s map function could define “key” and “value” as
> parameter types it would go a long way in terms or readability, in my opinion.
The map function does not impose names on the arguments of the literal closure.
You can choose them freely.
-Thorsten
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
