> On Jun 29, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Matthew Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> My criticism of the 'toNearestOrGreatest' still stands though. I think this
> name is misleading given the stated semantics. The name indicates "greater
> value" not "greater magnitude" which are opposites in the case of negative
> numbers.
Yup, I agree. I think I originally suggested `toNearestTiesAway`. I’m not
tied to that name specifically, but we should be clear that ties go away from
zero, not up.
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution