> On Jun 29, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Matthew Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> My criticism of the 'toNearestOrGreatest' still stands though.  I think this 
> name is misleading given the stated semantics.  The name indicates "greater 
> value" not "greater magnitude" which are opposites in the case of negative 
> numbers.

Yup, I agree.  I think I originally suggested `toNearestTiesAway`.  I’m not 
tied to that name specifically, but we should be clear that ties go away from 
zero, not up.
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to