On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Stephen Canon via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jun 29, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Matthew Johnson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > My criticism of the 'toNearestOrGreatest' still stands though. I think > this name is misleading given the stated semantics. The name indicates > "greater value" not "greater magnitude" which are opposites in the case of > negative numbers. > > > Yup, I agree. I think I originally suggested `toNearestTiesAway`. I’m > not tied to that name specifically, but we should be clear that ties go > away from zero, not up. > Agreed; `toNearestOrAwayFromZero` is the most accurate and consistent description. > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
