> On Jun 29, 2016, at 7:41 AM, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > `Syntax.IntegerLiteralType` is another that popped into my mind this morning. > I don’t recall if that has been mentioned yet. The idea here is that an > integer literal *can be typed as* a type that conforms to this protocol (the > type suffix *is not* used in the sense that it used to be used in things like > `SequenceType` which had the semantic that conforming types *are* sequences). >
Throwing my hat in: IntegerLiteralCandidate (with or without a Syntax. prefix) As in, when you see an integer literal and need to infer its actual type, this type is a candidate. -- Brent Royal-Gordon Architechies _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
