On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I think if `Syntax.IntegerLiteral` is actually unclear then the best
> cure is `ExpressibleAsIntegerLiteral` (no namespace needed). None of
> the other suggestions I've seen describe what the protocol means as well
> as that. I've asked Matthew to update the proposal accordingly.
I also like `ExpressibleAsIntegerLiteral`. It uses the ~ible/~able
convention which suggests a capability, and when the name is worded
like this, it is definitely describing a capability of the type.
Dmitri
--
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]>*/
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
