Thanks for the effort on the proposal and discussion and thanks to those working in the implementation.
-Shawn On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:25 AM Charles Srstka via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote: > Wow, thanks! I’m delighted that Apple found this improvement to be worth > inclusion in Swift 3. This will truly make the language much nicer to use > with the Cocoa frameworks. > > Thanks! > > Charles > > > On Jul 11, 2016, at 11:19 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Proposal Link: > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0112-nserror-bridging.md > > > > The review of "SE-0112: Improved NSError Bridging" ran from June 30 ... > July 4, 2016. The proposal has been *accepted*: > > > > The community and core team agree that this proposal is a huge step > forward that enriches the experience working with and extending the Cocoa > NSError model in Swift. The core team requests one minor renaming of > "attemptRecovery(optionIndex:andThen:)" to > "attemptRecovery(optionIndex:resultHandler:)”. It also discussed renaming > CustomNSError and RecoverableError, but decided to stay with those names. > > > > Thank you to Doug Gregor and Charles Srstka for driving this discussion > forward, and for Doug Gregor taking the charge on the implementation effort > to make this happen for Swift 3! > > > > -Chris Lattner > > Review Manager > > > > _______________________________________________ > > swift-evolution mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
