> On Jul 14, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Jul 14, 2016, at 2:39 PM, Chris Lattner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> asks the community for an in-depth discussion of the secondary points of the >> proposal: does it make sense to require every member to be marked as >> “overridable” in order to be overridden by an open subclass outside of the >> current module? > > To be clear: You want this discussion to happen in the next review thread, > rather than in this thread?
Yep, I’ll kick off another review period as soon as the proposal is revised (hopefully today). -Chris _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
