> On Jul 31, 2016, at 8:51 PM, Ben Rimmington <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 1 Aug 2016, at 00:00, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 15:42, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution >>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution >>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Gmane.org <http://gmane.org/> is shutting down. >>>>> http://ostatic.com/blog/mint-18-xfce-imminent-gmane-org-shutting-down >>>>> <http://ostatic.com/blog/mint-18-xfce-imminent-gmane-org-shutting-down> >>>>> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> "Long time mailing list archive site Gmane.org <http://gmane.org/> is >>>>>> shutting down. Gmane has been the home for technical mailing list >>>>>> references since 2002. But it's no longer fun for founder and only >>>>>> maintainer Lars Ingebrigtsen. He's been sued in India and threatened >>>>>> with legal action in at least France, among other annoyances. The straw >>>>>> that broke Ingebrigtsen's back was a sustained denial of service >>>>>> <https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2016/07/28/the-end-of-gmane/> attack >>>>>> throughout the month of July. He's been wondering a lot lately if it's >>>>>> all worth it. So, he's decided >>>>>> <https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2016/07/28/the-end-of-gmane/comment-page-1/#comment-13502> >>>>>> to move the mail and news servers to new hosting. However, Ingebrigtsen >>>>>> is indeed discontinuing the web-based archive. He said he's just "fed >>>>>> up." He's willing to send a disk with the web server archives to anyone >>>>>> who wants to take it over. But with the Gmane.org <http://gmane.org/> >>>>>> web presence gone, it feels like the end of an era. There is much >>>>>> wailing and gnashing of teeth throughout the community with some even >>>>>> trying to get a petition started." >>>>> >>>>> Because of this shutdown, numerous documents in the Swift Evolution >>>>> github archive no longer point to valid web links. I have pasted a list >>>>> of gmane links at the end of this message. As gmane's "robots.txt" >>>>> disallowed crawling, Google has not preserved the titles or text of the >>>>> links, which makes finding some of these a little tricky. >>>>> >>>>> Here are the remaining links that are not yet converted. Please consider >>>>> adopting a proposal, tracking down its links, and mailing this thread >>>>> with the proposal number, gmane links and pipermail equivalents. >>>>> Pipermail is located at >>>>> https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/ >>>>> <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/>. Some of these may >>>>> refer to build dev discussions instead of evolution ones. If you can, >>>>> please track down to the exact message for rationale, and the thread for >>>>> discussion and review links. >>>> >>>> Completely agreed. All of these should point to https://lists.swift.org >>>> <https://lists.swift.org/> (and always should have, exactly for reasons >>>> like this). I’d appreciate any PRs to help clean up the evolution repo to >>>> point to https://lists.swift.org <https://lists.swift.org/> instead. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> -Chris >> >>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 4:51 PM, Saagar Jha <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> I’d be happy to help. I see 94 instances of “gmane", do we want to split it >>> up (since I see Erica is on it already)? >>> >>> Saagar Jha >> >> If you start from the end (most recent proposals) and work backwards, it >> will be a lot easier for me. Thanks! -- E > > I'll update the middle third (SE-0046 ... SE-0090). > > -- Ben
Thanks! Here's what's left: proposals/0017-convert-unmanaged-to-use-unsafepointer.md:* Status: **Accepted for Swift 3** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/16118)) proposals/0017-convert-unmanaged-to-use-unsafepointer.md:[Swift Evolution Discussion](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/9877), [Proposed Rewrite Discussion](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/68/) proposals/0019-package-manager-testing.md:* Status: **Accepted** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/4103), [Bug](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-592)) proposals/0019-package-manager-testing.md:[SE Review Link](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/3583) proposals/0021-generalized-naming.md:* Status: **Implemented in Swift 2.2** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/3317/focus=3961)) proposals/0022-objc-selectors.md:* Status: **Accepted** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/4622)) proposals/0022-objc-selectors.md:Swift-evolution thread: [here](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/1384/focus=1403) proposals/0023-api-guidelines.md:* Status: **Accepted** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/8585)) proposals/0024-optional-value-setter.md:* Status: **Rejected** ([Rationale](http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/7694)) proposals/0025-scoped-access-level.md:* Status: **Accepted for Swift 3** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/12183/focus=13584), [Bug](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1275)) proposals/0025-scoped-access-level.md:[Swift Evolution Discussion](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/9334), [Next Steps Discussion](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/12183) proposals/0026-abstract-classes-and-methods.md:* Status: **Deferred** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/8809)) proposals/0027-string-from-code-units.md:* Status: **Rejected** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/7695)) proposals/0028-modernizing-debug-identifiers.md:* Status: **Implemented in Swift 2.2** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/5805), Bug: [SR-669](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-669)) proposals/0029-remove-implicit-tuple-splat.md:* Status: **Accepted** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/6405)) proposals/0030-property-behavior-decls.md:* Status: **Rejected** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/7735)) proposals/0030-property-behavior-decls.md:[Swift Evolution Discussion](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/11976)<br/> proposals/0030-property-behavior-decls.md:[Review](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/6426) proposals/0031-adjusting-inout-declarations.md:* Status: **Accepted for Swift 3** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/7394)) proposals/0031-adjusting-inout-declarations.md:*The initial Swift-Evolution discussion of this topic took place in the "[Replace 'inout' with &](http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/2751)" thread.* proposals/0032-sequencetype-find.md:* Status: **Accepted for Swift 3** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/16116)) proposals/0033-import-objc-constants.md:* Status: **Implemented in Swift 3** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/8817)) proposals/0034-disambiguating-line.md:* Status: **Accepted** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/8156), [Implementation Bug](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-840)) proposals/0034-disambiguating-line.md:The discussion took place on-line in the [*\[Discussion\]: Renaming #line, the line control statement*](http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/5815) thread. proposals/0035-limit-inout-capture.md:* Status: **Accepted** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/7732), [Bug](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-807)) proposals/0036-enum-dot.md:*Discussion took place on the Swift Evolution mailing list in the [\[Discussion\] Enum Leading Dot Prefixes](http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/6684) thread. This proposal uses lowerCamelCase enumeration cases in compliance with proposals/0036-enum-dot.md:current [API Guideline Working Group guidance](http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution).* proposals/0037-clarify-comments-and-operators.md:* Status: **Accepted** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/12350), [Bug](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-960)) proposals/0037-clarify-comments-and-operators.md:Swift-evolution thread: [started here](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/605) proposals/0037-clarify-comments-and-operators.md:and [continued here](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/2855). proposals/0038-swiftpm-c-language-targets.md:[Swift Evolution Review Thread](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/7293) proposals/0039-playgroundliterals.md:* Status: **Accepted** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/9149/), [Bug](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-917)) proposals/0039-playgroundliterals.md:*Discussion took place on the Swift Evolution mailing list in the [\[Discussion\] Modernizing Playground Literals](http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/7124) thread. Thanks to [Chris Lattner](https://github.com/lattner) for suggesting this enhancement.* proposals/0040-attributecolons.md:* Status: **Accepted for Swift 3** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/8920)) proposals/0040-attributecolons.md:*Discussion took place on the Swift Evolution mailing list in the [\[Discussion\] Replacing Equal Signs with Colons For Attribute Arguments](http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/7271) thread. Thanks to [Doug Gregor](https://github.com/DougGregor) for suggesting this enhancement.* proposals/0042-flatten-method-types.md:* Status: **Accepted for Swift 3** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/12828), [Bug](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1051)) proposals/0043-declare-variables-in-case-labels-with-multiple-patterns.md:* Status: **Accepted for Swift 3** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/12827)) proposals/0043-declare-variables-in-case-labels-with-multiple-patterns.md:Swift-evolution thread: [here](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/4256) proposals/0044-import-as-member.md:* Status: **Implemented in Swift 3** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/12842), [Bug](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1053)) proposals/0044-import-as-member.md:[Swift-evolution thread](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/8437)<br /> proposals/0044-import-as-member.md:[Review](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/12274) proposals/0045-scan-takewhile-dropwhile.md:* Status: **Accepted for Swift 3** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/16119), [Bug](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1516)) proposals/0045-scan-takewhile-dropwhile.md:[Proposal: Add scan, takeWhile, dropWhile, and iterate to the stdlib](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/1515) proposals/0045-scan-takewhile-dropwhile.md:[rationale]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/16119 proposals/0076-copying-to-unsafe-mutable-pointer-with-unsafe-pointer-source.md:* Status: **Accepted with Revisions for Swift 3** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/16898), [Bug](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1490)) proposals/0079-upgrade-self-from-weak-to-strong.md:[Swift Evolution Discussion Thread](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/7582), [Draft Proposal](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/6064) proposals/0080-failable-numeric-initializers.md:* Status: **Accepted with Revisions for Swift 3** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/16899), [Bug](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1491)) proposals/0081-move-where-expression.md:[\[Pitch\] Moving where Clauses Out Of Parameter Lists](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/13886/focus=13899) proposals/0082-swiftpm-package-edit.md:* Status: **Accepted for Swift 3** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/16614)) proposals/0082-swiftpm-package-edit.md:[Proposal Announcement](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/15279) proposals/0082-swiftpm-package-edit.md:[Review announcement](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/16078) proposals/0085-package-manager-command-name.md:* Status: **Implemented in Swift 3** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.build/1/focus=26)) proposals/0085-package-manager-command-name.md:[Swift Build Review Thread](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.build/1/) proposals/0085-package-manager-command-name.md:[Swift Evolution Review Thread](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.build/1/focus=16764) proposals/0086-drop-foundation-ns.md:* Status: **Accepted** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/23869)) proposals/0086-drop-foundation-ns.md:[Swift Evolution Discussion Thread](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/16298) proposals/0086-drop-foundation-ns.md:[Review Thread](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/16509) proposals/0088-libdispatch-for-swift3.md:* Status: **Accepted with Revisions** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/17819)) proposals/0088-libdispatch-for-swift3.md:[Review thread](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/16745) proposals/0092-typealiases-in-protocols.md:* Status: **Implemented in Swift 3.0** ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/17317)) proposals/0094-sequence-function.md:Swift-evolution thread: [Discussion thread topic for that proposal](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/15743/focus=17108) proposals/0094-sequence-function.md:[SE-0045a]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/16119 proposals/0095-any-as-existential.md:Discussion threads: [pre-proposal](https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/Week-of-Mon-20160516/018109.html), [review thread 1](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/18349), [2](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/18350/focus=18447), [3](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/18351/focus=18440), [4](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/18518), [post-review thread](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/19463) proposals/0096-dynamictype.md:[RFC: didset and willset](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/17534) proposals/0097-negative-attributes.md:[RFC: didset and willset](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/17534) proposals/0098-didset-capitalization.md:[RFC: didset and willset](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/17534) proposals/0099-conditionclauses.md:[\[Pitch\] making where and , interchangeable in guard conditions](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/17926) proposals/0101-standardizing-sizeof-naming.md:* Swift Evolution Pitch: [\[Pitch\] Renaming sizeof, sizeofValue, strideof, strideofValue](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/19459) proposals/0101-standardizing-sizeof-naming.md:* [Earlier Discussions](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/15830) proposals/0101-standardizing-sizeof-naming.md:* [SE-0101 Review](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/21103) proposals/0103-make-noescape-default.md:* [Make non-escaping closures the default](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/19756) proposals/0105-remove-where-from-forin-loops.md:Swift Evolution Discussion: [\[Pitch\] Retiring `where` from for-in loops](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/20142) proposals/0106-rename-osx-to-macos.md:Swift Evolution Discussion: [\[DRAFT\] Aliasing the OS X Platform Configuration Test](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/20815) proposals/0108-remove-assoctype-inference.md:swift-evolution thread: [pre-proposal](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/21714) proposals/0108-remove-assoctype-inference.md:As Douglas Gregor (original author of the relevant type inference code) [puts it](http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/22058): proposals/0108-remove-assoctype-inference.md:To some extent, this is an issue inherent to any design which makes no distinctions at the site of implementation between members intended to satisfy protocol requirements and members that are explicitly not intended to satisfy protocol requirements. Rather than adding keywords to create this distinction, Douglas Gregor has [proposed and implemented type checker heuristics](http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.devel/1799) that will generate warnings when a programmer implements a member that "looks like" it should fulfill a protocol requirement but does not actually do so. This is one possible mitigation strategy that should be revisited as a way to decrease the possible impact of removing associated type witness inference from the compiler. proposals/0108-remove-assoctype-inference.md:As well, Dave Abrahams expresses a [potential issue](http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/21892): proposals/0109-remove-boolean.md:* Status: Accepted ([Rationale](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/23844)) proposals/0109-remove-boolean.md:[Discussion thread](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/21559) proposals/0110-distingish-single-tuple-arg.md:Discussion: [pre-proposal](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/21732) proposals/0111-remove-arg-label-type-significance.md:Discussion: [pre-proposal](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/21369) proposals/0114-buffer-naming.md:[Swift Evolution Thread](http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/22127)
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
